USMLE Forum - Largest USMLE Community

Full Version: which is correct?? - nerves
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Q1) achalasia is...Progressive disease according to Premier review
.......................Non progressive according to MTB??

Q2)what is the follow up of endoscopy??

According to Premier:
Barrets esophagus...endoscopy 3-5 yrs with biopsy
low grade dysplasis...endoscopy every year with biopsy
high grade................surgery

According to MTB:
barrets ....2-3 yrs with biopsy
low grade....3-6 months with biopsy
high grade...surgey

guys...which book is more authentic??
MTB same as Kaplan
It should be MTB

From CMDT 2010. Wink



In patients known to have Barrett esophagus, surveillance endoscopy" every 3 years" to look for dysplasia or adenocarcinoma generally is recommended.

Patients with low-grade dysplasia require repeat endoscopic surveillance in" 6 months" to screen for coexisting high-grade dysplasia or cancer.

If low-grade dysplasia "PERSISTS" (which occurs in < 25% of patients), endoscopic surveillance should be repeated "yearly."


Photodynamic therapy or radiofrequency wave electrocautery (HALO) may be used to ablate Barrett tissue in patients with "high-grade dysplasia without a visible esophageal nodule" and to ablate Barrett tissue after endoscopic mucosal resection of a nodule with high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal cancer. An uncontrolled prospective US endoscopic study of radiofrequency wave ablation of Barrett tissue with high-grade dysplasia has shown complete resolution of dysplasia in 80% of patients.

Alternatively, patients with "high-grade dysplasia without visible lesions" may undergo close endoscopic surveillance with biopsy every 3“6 months, reserving surgery or photodynamic therapies for approximately 7% of patients per year during follow-up in whom adenocarcinoma develops

So, the treatment of patients with high-grade dysplasia or superficial mucosal cancers is controversial and evolving rapidly..

Until recently, esophagectomy has been recommended for all patients deemed to have a low operative risk. However, esophagectomy is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates (40% and 2“9%, respectively). Therefore, other options should be considered for patients with high-grade dysplasia, especially those who are deemed to be at high risk for esophagectomy.

try to use reference book if have confusion. Smile

look arround to download CMDT 2010 Wink
thnaxx guysSmile