Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Life or death - arrythmia
#1
A 26-year-woman who experienced severe brain injury as a result of a motor vehicle accident several weeks ago undergoes neurologic examination. Since the accident, she has remained in a deep coma, with no evidence of consciousness or any purposeful movement. She is receiving nutrition, hydration, and medications through a nasogastric tube.

After her neurologic examination, the patient's family is told that her clinical signs and symptoms are likely indicative of an impending persistent vegetative state. Her entire family, including her husband who is her formally designated health care proxy, recall numerous conversations with the patient in which she expressed the desire for life-prolonging efforts, assuming there were a reasonable possibility of recovery allowing her to interact with her family; however, she rejected the prospect of life-sustaining measures if it were determined with reasonable medical certainty that she was going to be in a permanently unconscious state. Family members resist placement of a gastrostomy tube because they worry that once this type of support is initiated, it cannot legally be discontinued; however, they understand that it would provide optimal access for medications, nutrition, and fluids.

Which of the following is the most appropriate recommendation for this patient's family?
A Continue nasogastric tube feedings
B Initiate total parenteral nutrition
C Place gastrostomy tube
D Seek intervention from a court-appointed guardian
Reply
#2
B?
not sure about d..
Reply
#3
aa?
Reply
#4
hubby is a health care proxy...so i think we should listen to what he says...
Reply
#5
The prognosis of patients who are in a coma induced by severe head trauma, particularly those who are young and otherwise healthy, is less predictable than that of those who have experienced nontraumatic coma. It would therefore be reasonable to continue to provide basic life support to this patient at this time, including adequate nutrition and hydration. In this case, gastrostomy tube placement would be appropriate to allow for long-term feeding considering the indefinite course of the patient's condition. Conversely, nasogastric feeding tubes are usually a temporary measure. The mean life span of a nasogastric tube in adults is about 10 days; most tube removals occur accidentally. Complications of nasogastric tubes include gastric perforation, local nasal trauma, gastroesophageal reflux, and pulmonary aspiration.the family should be informed that, despite their fears, initiating gastrostomy feeding does not preclude removal of the tube should the patient's prognosis worsen and a decision to stop all treatment be made

C
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »


Forum Jump: