Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Clinical Research or Observership? More Important - chance
#1

Which is more important?

Clinical Research or Observership
Reply
#2
You forgot externship, contacts and a lot of luck.
Reply
#3
yup.

So, Research, Observership, or externship? Which is most importnat and which is least.
Reply
#4
luck is the most important ingredient
Reply
#5
That is for always.

What about following three,

Research, Observership, or externship? Which is most importnat and which is least
Reply
#6
most important is the one where you shine and least important is where you made a fool of yourself
Reply
#7
In order of decreasing order of preference

Externship , observership, Research

Externship counts as "Hands on" clinical experience so it carries the most weightage

here are some points


Why do an observership, research or an externship in the United
States?

Before we give our views on how to find an observership, research or an externship in the
US, let™s first give you a few reasons as to why to opt for these options.

(1) Observerships, research and externships give you an exposure of healthcare system of
United States and give you an idea of what to expect during residency; (the nature of work,
healthcare facilities, code of conduct for healthcare professionals, the cutting edge technology,
electronic healthcare records, diseases prevalent in a certain geographical area and the social
and cultural values of people of United States).

(2) By working with US physicians and researchers, you make œconnections in the System
which pays you a lot later on when you are applying for a residency spot in the US after doing
your USMLE (Unites States Medical Licensing Examination). The name of an imminent
scientist or clinician in the references section of your CV can open many doors for you in your
professional life. The Letters of recommendations (LORs) from the faculty of a renowned
hospital in US are always looked favorably by program directors of residencies and
fellowships.

(3) If you opt for an externship, it will count as your US clinical experience (USCE). Due to
growing number of highly qualified candidates from the world, the competition is fierce to get
a residency spot. Many residency programs want to see USCE as a prerequisite to apply into
their residency program. If you don™t have USCE you are simply screened out from the list of
eligible candidates for interviews for those programs who require USCE.

(4) If you choose to join a research team, you may get some quality publications which do
carry some weight age when screening candidates for interview and more importantly at the
time of ranking candidates for the residency spots. Even if you are not able to publish a few
research papers, your experience in a research team will reflect your genuine interest and
aptitude for research which is seen highly favorable by many university residency programs.

What to Choose?

Among observership, research and externship, if you have to choose one; go for externship
because it carries the highest weight age of all three. Externship is called a œmini residency.
During externship you get œhands on clinical experience as you are actively involved in
patient care; you can take history, examine the patients and get involved in patient
management along with residents. But the problem is that most of the hospitals do not allow
externships due to tough laws of patient privacy and HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability
and Accountability Act) rules.

The bottom-line, however is, that get whatever you can; may it be research, observership or
externship, but prefer externship over research and observership.

How to find a research position, observership or an externship?

Regarding research, first of all to be very honest emailing professors or other research
scientists does not help much. Most of the directors of research don't open any mail that
would be related to a research opening or volunteering; that's what my Principal Investigator
told me, but exceptions are always there. So you should try and mail the researchers but the
chances of ending up in a spot are not much as most of the researchers get hundreds of such
mails daily from all over the world and they are screened by their spam filters unless they
have an open position. And if you are away from US and the only thing you can do is to email
the researchers then my advice would be not to send a generic mail to all the scientist and
wait to hit the jackpot. Do your homework well, send an individualized email to every
scientist, know his research well, find his publications on pubmed and make an appropriate
cover letter which should show your genuine interest in the research that person is doing.

If you are lucky enough to be in US then the best bet would be to meet the researchers in
person. Take a well written CV and a cover letter with you. But before going to any person
you should spend some time and find his areas of interest, his current and previous research
projects so that you can have common grounds during discussion with that person.
If you don™t have previous research experience , my advice would be that not to ask for a
œPaid position as nobody is going to pay you from day 1 without enough research skills and
experience. Try to volunteer in some lab for 2-3 months, learn some basic research
techniques and you can later get paid in the same or some other lab if the investigator is
satisfied with your research work.

Another important factor when deciding to work in a research lab is to choose to work with a
researcher who is a big shot in his field as his reference would count when you would be
applying anywhere for any type of work. One way of finding out if the person is a big name is
to search his name on pubmed.gov and find out the impact factor of few of his publications.
But that may not be true in every case.

Regarding observerships, the same would apply. However, the difference in this case would
be that you should contact renowned clinicians through email, phone calls or better still meet
them in person. Another good option is to find an M.D., PHD who is involved in both research
and direct patient care and start volunteering in some of his lab work and then later begin
attending clinics with him, if he is still doing them.

Externship as I previously mentioned are difficult to get but if a certain program offers
externships, then they will have a certain office dedicated to it and you can email or call
them. But for externships these hospitals usually charge you a handsome amount for a
limited period of time and you also have to buy malpractice insurance; but all that spending
is worth it.

Types of Research:

Now coming to what kind of research you should join. There are two basic types of research:
(1) basic science or bench research and (2) clinical research. There are advantages and
disadvantages of both.

For most types of clinical research, the plus point is that there often there is patient contact,
for those who are not interested in typical lab work. However at the same time if you talk
about bench research, the plus point is that often you get hands on experience on latest lab
techniques such as RT PCR, luciferase assay, western blots etc but to get a publication in
basic science research is relatively more laborious and difficult. But if you are interested in
lab work and are considering in pursuing a PhD as well, then the latter may be a better
choice.


GL


Medhelp Team

For PS, LOR, MSPE, RESUME

mail at

medhelp@live.com
Reply
#8
At the end it is actually the LORs which count,Is not it so ?
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »


Forum Jump: