Posts: 3,675,934
Threads: 734,342
Joined:
Sep 2021
Reputation:
5
1- In assessing the efficacy of natalizumab, in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS), a randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled study was performed with a total of 1000 people divided equally between the treatment and placebo groups. The study lasted for three (3) years and during this period, the reduction in relative risk for primary events (relapse of current MS or progression to a more chronic form of MS) was 8%. The absolute risk reduction was smaller because the study group had a low incidence of MS-associated events., 1% in the control group and 3% in the treatment group. How many patients must be treated for three years with natalizumab to prevent a primary event in one person?
A. 2
B. 1
C. 50
D. 100
E. 20
Posts: 3,675,934
Threads: 734,342
Joined:
Sep 2021
Reputation:
5
ARR
3%-1% = 2%
NNT
2% or 1 in 50
FA page 50
Posts: 3,675,934
Threads: 734,342
Joined:
Sep 2021
Reputation:
5
i did not get it.......pl help
ARR= control- exposed/treated
but qs says control=1%, treated=3%
am i missing a point here..??
Posts: 3,675,934
Threads: 734,342
Joined:
Sep 2021
Reputation:
5
NNT = 1ARR
ARR= incidence 1 - incidence 2 = 3% - 1% = 2% = 2/100
NNT = 1 2% = 1 (2100) = 1002 = 50
Posts: 3,675,934
Threads: 734,342
Joined:
Sep 2021
Reputation:
5
sorry it didn't post it as I wrote it. here I will write it again
NNT = 1 ARR
ARR= incidence 1 - incidence 2 = 3% - 1% = 2% = 2 / 100
NNT = 1 2% = 1 (2 100) = 100 2 = 50
Posts: 3,675,934
Threads: 734,342
Joined:
Sep 2021
Reputation:
5
Again it doesn't post it correctly I don't know why. anyway I think your problem is that when you calculate AAR you forget the (%). so you say ARR= 2 , but it not just 2 , it must be 2% with means 0.02
Posts: 3,675,934
Threads: 734,342
Joined:
Sep 2021
Reputation:
5
ARR= control- exposed/treated
is not Absolute risk reduction defined as above.??
i did not understand incidence1 and incidence2.
any one...??