10-17-2006, 12:23 PM
CD45,
From your conventional method,89 atp's,the number is correct.But I didnt get why would you take off 2 ATP for activation of propionyl Co-A?(When, from my knowledge on this B-Oxidation,once the fatty acid got activated by taking 2 high energy bonds and entered itochondrial matrix,its there until its completlely oxidised,and unlike the remaining acetyl co-A,even Propionyl Co-A will directly enter TCA cycleat the level of Succinyl Co-A ,there by yielding 1NADH(instead of 3NADH like Acetyl Co-A),1FADH,1GTP===yielding 6ATP ,instead of 12.)
So you need to take off,6ATP's for TCA cycle of Propionyl Co.A,(So your final calculation coincides with mine as you have taken off 6 ATP's for propionyl co-A...but I just got a little lost...From -4ATP from TCA and -2ATP for activation ...can you please clear my confusion...)
And coming to your Q, Yeah,the calcultion isn't working.I didnt know this formula before.But I felt may be I can use it for fast calculation,when the options given are not in a narrow range....if they give 88,87,89 ...may be I will go for conventional method.
I suppose from this example ,may be the formula gives a rough estimate,not exact..(though I am not sure of it..as I already said,this is first time I knew about this formula)
But thank you for this,as it would make my life easy,if wide range if opyions are given...I can just calculate roughly,mark it and move on...if I get time come back and calculate conventionally.
But if you are 100% sure the formula is exact one...then ...I dont know...bcoz both 89 and 88 are correct then...mark something pray and move on:-)o correct myself.
Hope this helps
Thanks
If some one else find my approach wrong,please correct me...I will be happy t
From your conventional method,89 atp's,the number is correct.But I didnt get why would you take off 2 ATP for activation of propionyl Co-A?(When, from my knowledge on this B-Oxidation,once the fatty acid got activated by taking 2 high energy bonds and entered itochondrial matrix,its there until its completlely oxidised,and unlike the remaining acetyl co-A,even Propionyl Co-A will directly enter TCA cycleat the level of Succinyl Co-A ,there by yielding 1NADH(instead of 3NADH like Acetyl Co-A),1FADH,1GTP===yielding 6ATP ,instead of 12.)
So you need to take off,6ATP's for TCA cycle of Propionyl Co.A,(So your final calculation coincides with mine as you have taken off 6 ATP's for propionyl co-A...but I just got a little lost...From -4ATP from TCA and -2ATP for activation ...can you please clear my confusion...)
And coming to your Q, Yeah,the calcultion isn't working.I didnt know this formula before.But I felt may be I can use it for fast calculation,when the options given are not in a narrow range....if they give 88,87,89 ...may be I will go for conventional method.
I suppose from this example ,may be the formula gives a rough estimate,not exact..(though I am not sure of it..as I already said,this is first time I knew about this formula)
But thank you for this,as it would make my life easy,if wide range if opyions are given...I can just calculate roughly,mark it and move on...if I get time come back and calculate conventionally.
But if you are 100% sure the formula is exact one...then ...I dont know...bcoz both 89 and 88 are correct then...mark something pray and move on:-)o correct myself.
Hope this helps
Thanks
If some one else find my approach wrong,please correct me...I will be happy t