07-09-2007, 01:23 PM
My preparation for step 3 was for around 3 months.Sice the concepts of step 2 were fresh,I did not do either step 2 or step 3 kaplan books.But whenever I had doubts i cleared them with step 2 ck books.Gave 1 reading of Swansons.I really liked the book,it was a very good revision,IT REINFORCES ALL THE IMPORTANT DETAILS,FOR THE EXAM.
In retrospect,the exam is bit vague.We already know the concepts well,but they ask it in slightly diffrent angle,as to what u will tell the pts about the prognosis.Alot of questions stressed the impotance of sking for
suicidal tendencies in depressed people.A potpurri of cts,ekg derm pictures,mri,fundus etc.
Time was also vital,so much of details in every q,but atleast we have to go thru them once,even though half te details are distractors.polypharmacy,ethics were heavily tested.Not much of statistics,a q on nnt,number needed to treat.Time management is the key!
THE CASES WERE,
1. ELDERLY WOMAN WITH UNEXPECTED PREGNANCY,
2.h/o arthritis who takes aspirin,now has gastritis
3.child with gastroenteritis,but he does not get better with fluids,turns out to be meningitis
4.mva with perforation,accepted for sx
5.siadh with lung nodule
6.mva with heart block
7.substance intoxication,thought it was morphine,but did not get bettr with naloxone,and as the rr was going down,i intubated and ventilated,the case ended,ordered everything else in after the 5 min warning
8.small bowel obstruction
9.acute sinusitis
It is a doable exam,but even after the exam, I don't know what book I should have studied,to feel better.A thorough understanding of all the concepts is vital.Ethics is vague,so answering them well really depends on the choices of answers given to us and our presence of mind.
In retrospect,the exam is bit vague.We already know the concepts well,but they ask it in slightly diffrent angle,as to what u will tell the pts about the prognosis.Alot of questions stressed the impotance of sking for
suicidal tendencies in depressed people.A potpurri of cts,ekg derm pictures,mri,fundus etc.
Time was also vital,so much of details in every q,but atleast we have to go thru them once,even though half te details are distractors.polypharmacy,ethics were heavily tested.Not much of statistics,a q on nnt,number needed to treat.Time management is the key!
THE CASES WERE,
1. ELDERLY WOMAN WITH UNEXPECTED PREGNANCY,
2.h/o arthritis who takes aspirin,now has gastritis
3.child with gastroenteritis,but he does not get better with fluids,turns out to be meningitis
4.mva with perforation,accepted for sx
5.siadh with lung nodule
6.mva with heart block
7.substance intoxication,thought it was morphine,but did not get bettr with naloxone,and as the rr was going down,i intubated and ventilated,the case ended,ordered everything else in after the 5 min warning
8.small bowel obstruction
9.acute sinusitis
It is a doable exam,but even after the exam, I don't know what book I should have studied,to feel better.A thorough understanding of all the concepts is vital.Ethics is vague,so answering them well really depends on the choices of answers given to us and our presence of mind.