Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
q106 - sami2004
#1
here is an easy to make up for those hard one

Mr. White is a 60-year-old man with severe chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease. He is a widower and has no children.
He is admitted to the hospital with pneumonia and respiratory
failure promptly develops. You tell him that he will die without
intubation and mechanical ventilation. He does not have an
advance directive, but he does have decision-making capacity.
He tells you that he does not want mechanical ventilation,
stating he is “at peace with God’s will.” He understands the
consequences of his refusal, including death.

Which of the following
statements is true about the patient’s decision?

a. It is ethically and legally permissible for a physician to override
the patient’s decision and intubate and mechanically
ventilate him in order to keep him alive.

b. Because Mr. White doesn’t have an advance directive, a court
must affirm his decision.

c. His decision is inconsistent with standard medical practice
and, hence, honoring his refusal of intubation and mechanical
ventilation would be grounds for malpractice.

d. Patients with decision-making capacity have the right to refuse
life-sustaining treatments even if such refusals result in death.

e. In cases such as these, hospital chaplains should be asked to
convince patients to change their minds.
Reply
#2
d.
Reply
#3
A 73-year-old man with metastatic pancreatic cancer is admitted
to your hospital service because of intractable malignancyassociated
pain. He also has a history of ischemic cardiomyopathy
and has an implanted cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). You give
him intravenous morphine (morphine drip), and his pain
improves. However, during the first day of his hospitalization,
he experiences 4 uncomfortable ICD defibrillations; the defibrillations
are appropriate (ie, because of ventricular dysrhythmias).
Knowing that he is dying, the patient requests comfort
care only. Furthermore, not wanting to experience more defibrillations,
he requests deactivation of the ICD. He does not have
an advance directive.

Regarding the request to deactivate the ICD, you should:

a. Refuse to comply because doing so is the same as euthanasia.
b. Comply with the request.
c. Refuse to comply because he does not have an advance
directive.
d. Refuse to comply because an ICD is not a life-sustaining
treatment and deactivating an ICD is not a form of comfort
care.
e. Although it is ethical and legal for a patient who has a medical
indication for an ICD to refuse ICD implantation, it is
unethical and illegal for a physician to deactivate an ICD
after it is implanted
Reply
#4
b guessing
Reply
#5
DD
Reply
#6
B.
Reply
#7
d,b
Reply
#8
E....
Reply
#9
D,B
Reply
#10
d ,b
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »


Forum Jump: