USMLE Forum - Largest USMLE Community
nbme 2#32 - verypositive - Printable Version

+- USMLE Forum - Largest USMLE Community (https://www.usmleforum.com)
+-- Forum: USMLE Forum (https://www.usmleforum.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Step 3 (https://www.usmleforum.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Thread: nbme 2#32 - verypositive (/showthread.php?tid=415660)



nbme 2#32 - verypositive - ArchivalUser - 06-01-2009

Incidence of Bacteruria Related to Catheter Use

Study Randomized Suprapubic Catheter Transurethral Catheter Odds Ratio +95% CI

A No 2/25 21/31 0.04(0.01-0.24)

B Yes 10/48 20/44 0.32(0.11-0.86)

C Yes 2/32 16/34 0.08(0.01-0.41)

D Yes 8/32 5/40 1.87(0.48-8.01)

*CI=confidence interval


A Colleague suggests to you that suprapubic catheters can decrease a patient's risk for bacterial colonization. You identify four studies in the medical literature that compare the incidence of bacteruria in patients with a transurethral catheter versus patients with a suprapubic catheter. The study results are shown. Which of the following is the most important criterion related to the validity of these data?

A) Confidence interval
B) The number of patients with bacteriuria
C) Odds ratio
D) Sample size
E) Study design



0 - ArchivalUser - 06-01-2009

ddd


0 - ArchivalUser - 06-01-2009

ddd,


0 - ArchivalUser - 06-01-2009

ddd


0 - ArchivalUser - 06-02-2009

can anyone educate me of this one? based on what we know it's sample size issue (confident interval or absolute number?) or its not sutdy design issue?


0 - ArchivalUser - 06-02-2009

Consider 2 studies ... one with 10 patients as sample size and other with 10000 patients as sample size. Which result will be more valid. Validity also depends on the power of the study which inturn is proportional to the sample size.


0 - ArchivalUser - 06-03-2009

dddd?