Best resources for step3/impressive score - docsendi - Printable Version +- USMLE Forum - Largest USMLE Community (https://www.usmleforum.com) +-- Forum: USMLE Forum (https://www.usmleforum.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Step 3 (https://www.usmleforum.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=6) +--- Thread: Best resources for step3/impressive score - docsendi (/showthread.php?tid=817444) Pages:
1
2
|
Best resources for step3/impressive score - docsendi - ArchivalUser - 11-10-2015 Hi guys I appreciate if somebody let me know what are the best resources for step3 and what is an impressive score for IM programs in step 3 0 - ArchivalUser - 11-10-2015 MTB 3 UW, Kaplan Q bank UW biostatics review UW CCS 51 case subscription mapping 100 case pdf the higher the score, the more impressive it will be. 0 - ArchivalUser - 11-10-2015 Thanks amoeba For Step 1 and Step2, scores higher than 240-250 considered to be impressive, Is this the same for step 3 or people generally get lower scores in step3 compared to Step 1 and 2? 0 - ArchivalUser - 11-10-2015 ARCHER Step 3 - both CCS and theory review --the best UWORLD - both CCS and Q-bank - best in Q-banks Kaplan ma be if you have time MTB3 for last minute review, watch out lot of errors in it though 0 - ArchivalUser - 11-11-2015 @veroger So you think ARCHER is better than UW? 0 - ArchivalUser - 11-11-2015 ARCHER vs UW? Which one would you pick? 0 - ArchivalUser - 11-12-2015 Anyone with a definition of impressive score? Is that the same of CK or generally scores are lower than CK? 0 - ArchivalUser - 11-12-2015 docsendi, Archer and UW are two different products. UW CCS is software and Archer is thorough demonstration of CCS cases on the exam software along with strategies. UW and Archer complement each other, both need to be done in my opinion. If you start with Archer CCS and Theory, UW CCS and Q-bank become just easier to complete and understand. Good luck 0 - ArchivalUser - 11-20-2015 Any comments on score comparison to CK? 0 - ArchivalUser - 11-21-2015 Archer is very repetitive. It's just recording of their lectures. Not very time efficient, |