Posts: 3,675,934
Threads: 734,342
Joined:
Sep 2021
Reputation:
5
Hi guys
I appreciate if somebody let me know what are the best resources for step3 and what is an impressive score for IM programs in step 3
Posts: 3,675,934
Threads: 734,342
Joined:
Sep 2021
Reputation:
5
MTB 3
UW, Kaplan Q bank
UW biostatics review
UW CCS 51 case subscription
mapping 100 case pdf
the higher the score, the more impressive it will be.
Posts: 3,675,934
Threads: 734,342
Joined:
Sep 2021
Reputation:
5
Thanks amoeba
For Step 1 and Step2, scores higher than 240-250 considered to be impressive, Is this the same for step 3 or people generally get lower scores in step3 compared to Step 1 and 2?
Posts: 3,675,934
Threads: 734,342
Joined:
Sep 2021
Reputation:
5
ARCHER Step 3 - both CCS and theory review --the best
UWORLD - both CCS and Q-bank - best in Q-banks
Kaplan ma be if you have time
MTB3 for last minute review, watch out lot of errors in it though
Posts: 3,675,934
Threads: 734,342
Joined:
Sep 2021
Reputation:
5
@veroger
So you think ARCHER is better than UW?
Posts: 3,675,934
Threads: 734,342
Joined:
Sep 2021
Reputation:
5
ARCHER vs UW? Which one would you pick?
Posts: 3,675,934
Threads: 734,342
Joined:
Sep 2021
Reputation:
5
Anyone with a definition of impressive score? Is that the same of CK or generally scores are lower than CK?
Posts: 3,675,934
Threads: 734,342
Joined:
Sep 2021
Reputation:
5
docsendi, Archer and UW are two different products. UW CCS is software and Archer is thorough demonstration of CCS cases on the exam software along with strategies.
UW and Archer complement each other, both need to be done in my opinion. If you start with Archer CCS and Theory, UW CCS and Q-bank become just easier to complete and understand. Good luck
Posts: 3,675,934
Threads: 734,342
Joined:
Sep 2021
Reputation:
5
Any comments on score comparison to CK?
Posts: 3,675,934
Threads: 734,342
Joined:
Sep 2021
Reputation:
5
Archer is very repetitive. It's just recording of their lectures. Not very time efficient,