Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Ques - ira3
#1
149) A 29 year old internal medicine resident physician has been exposed to a patient with cavitary pulmonary tuberculosis 1 month ago. He denies any symptoms. His physical examination is normal. A tuberculin skin test reaction is positive now at 6mm. His Skin test one year ago was negative. A chest X-ray is within normal limits and chemistry panel is normal. The most appropriate management optiuon for this patient is :

A) Isoniazid, Pyrazinamide, Rifampin and Ethambutol for 9 months

B) Observation as ≥ 10mm is considered positive in health care workers

C) Isoniazid for 9 months

D) Rifampin for 9 months

E) Isoniazid for 6 months
Reply
#2
cc
Reply
#3
B. and repeat ppd in 3 months
Reply
#4
does cavitatory TB will be high risk? y not c?
Reply
#5
b
Reply
#6
if it is not C then WHY they did CXR on him, because if the answer is C then we need the CXR
Reply
#7
where are this questions from ?
can you please tell us.

thank you
Reply
#8
I go with B
Reply
#9
from archer
Reply
#10
It's not B because the cutoff is lower in health and prison workers.

After treatment they receive follow-up chest x-rays

If the patient gets any side-effects (i.e., vivid dreams) on Isoniazid (unrelated to B6 deficiency) you'd do LFTs, THEN switch them to Rifampin. This mans you remember to advise them about orange/red bodily fluids, and any meds they're taking metabolized through the cyp-P450 (especially OCPs), and monitoring liver enzymes. IIRC, LFTs rising to 5X their baseline is the cut-off for stopping Rifampin.

The orange/red bodily fluids is not a side effect. It's because the drug is suspended in something orange/red.

A harder question would be which drugs can't you give during pregnancy.
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »


Forum Jump: